Commons:Requests for checkuser
Shortcuts: COM:CHECK • COM:RFCU • COM:SOCK
This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.
Requesting a check
These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
---|---|
Request completed | |
Confirmed | Technically indistinguishable |
Likely | Possilikely |
Possible | Unlikely |
Inconclusive | Unrelated |
No action | Stale |
Request declined | |
Declined | Checkuser is not for fishing |
Checkuser is not magic pixie dust. | The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says |
It looks like a duck to me | Checkuser is not a crystal ball. |
Information | |
Additional information needed | Deferred to |
Doing… | Info |
Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting a check:
- Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first, such as posting on the administrator's noticeboard. (This is not a venue for requesting administrative action such as blocks or file clean-up.)
- Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
- Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed and suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Requests to check accounts already confirmed on other projects may be declined as redundant.
- Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.
- Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
- Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated.
- The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses.
Outcome
Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear. Closed requests are archived after seven days.
Privacy concerns
If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombuds commission.
If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please purge this page's cache.
Requests[edit]
Hoàng Hp Minh[edit]
- Hoàng Hp Minh (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
[edit]
- Trần Thủ Túc (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Quang Minh Đại (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results[edit]
Reason: Abusing multiple accounts to reupload copyright violations. I'm requesting RFCU for a sleepers check.
Proof:
- Special:Undelete/File:An Viên-BTV9.png
- Special:Undelete/File:NCM-BTV10.png
- Special:Undelete/File:KenhPhimHay-AVG.png
- Special:Undelete/File:VietTeenBTV62idol.png
- Special:Undelete/File:Miền Tây-THĐT2.jpg
- Special:Undelete/File:ANT-BPTV3.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Confirmed:
- Duy Hoang Manh (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Hoàng Hp Minh (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Ngô Đình Diệm là tên Việt gian (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Phùng Út Hà (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Phạm Thanh Nghiên (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Quang Minh Đại (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Quỳnh Nhật Kim (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Tanhtachcu (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Thủ Túc (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Trương Bửu Diệp Là Tên Việt Gian Phản Quốc (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Trần Phi Xường (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Trần Thủ Túc (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Trịnh Lê Hoài Nam (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Tôm giống Lứa đầu (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
All indef. --Krd 04:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
A3cb1[edit]
- A3cb1 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
[edit]
- Ettore Bocconi (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results[edit]
Usual edit pattern.--Friniate (talk) 23:41, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Confirmed. Эlcobbola talk 12:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
História do Porto[edit]
- História do Porto (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
[edit]
- Romulo Portugal (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results[edit]
Reason: Exceptionally odd behavior at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miniatura de Maria Perpétua Calafate de Souza.png - the DR was started Romulo Portugal, but História do Porto became involved in the middle of the DR, within minutes of one of Romulo's edits (and behaving very similarly to Romulo). Meanwhile, at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maria Perpétua Calafate de Souza.jpg, Romulo nominated one of História's images for deletion, that História had previously nominated for deletion unsuccessfully.
I have my suspicions that many of the contributors at the pt.wiki article Maria Perpétua are different accounts controlled by the same user, but I don't think any of them are active on Commons except the two above. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Confirmed. Эlcobbola talk 15:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done I blocked Romulo Portugal, and warned História do Porto. Yann (talk) 16:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
PubblicUsername[edit]
- Livioandronico2013 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- PentaPrisma23 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- PubblicUsername (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- DellaGherardesca (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log ) (last identified sock)
Rationale, discussion and results
Reason: New account created to come back with exactly the same behavior such like Livioandronico2013's other recent accounts. See also Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Σπάρτακος at Wikidata. 83.61.247.43 14:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Info: Checkuser investigation at English Wikipedia confirmed relationship between Livio and PubblicUsername. PentaPrisma23, which looks like to be created short time after PubblicUsername's CU requests began, has the same format at their user page like PubblicUsername had on en.wikipedia and still has in Commons and Wikidata. 83.61.247.43 12:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- PentaPrisma23 is Likely. Эlcobbola talk 15:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done Both blocked. Yann (talk) 10:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- DellaGherardesca (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log ) is already globally locked. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- For older requests, please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Archives