Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
54,147 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 48,654 (89.9%) 
Undecided
  
 3,017 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,476 (4.6%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nirmal Dulal (talk) on 2024-02-14 10:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Aethopyga gouldiae (Mrs. Gould's sunbird) - Male

this image is nice. Nominated image would be big crop to show male. Female has little value. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Charles Thank you for being here. Can you fix this? or please suggest what to do. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
User Mildeep should crop this or if this is OK with him, you can download his image, crop it and upload the edited file. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks ! I did that. hope it is okay now. --Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) on 2024-02-15 09:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Benito Castro
Used in:
Benito Castro La Guereja ماريا الينا سالدانا بينيتو كاسترو Benito Castro (Q4888089)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 08:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-17 13:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Dendrocygna eytoni (Plumed whistling ducks) in flight
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-02-17 18:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Nameplate of the area. Petgatten De Feanhoop
Used in:
nl:Petgatten De Feanhoop • wikidata: Q24040916
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-02-18 06:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Haminoea orbignyana, shell
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Milseburg (talk) on 2024-02-18 11:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Summit of Steinküppel
Used in:
de:Steinküppel (Wildflecken)
Reason:
The motif is located in a restricted military area. An opportunity for such a perspective arises rarely, only during brief openings of the ground every few years for two days. -- Milseburg (talk)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-01-27 06:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Shiva accompanied by two deities - Kingdom of Champa (Vietnam) - Labit Museum
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-02-18 15:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Nissan Juke Hybrid - right rear view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-18 16:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Lathamus discolor (Swift parrot)
The "background colour" is grassy habitat and likely clover flowers. This photo of illustrates that Swift parrot is well camouflaged, despite its brilliant coloring. --Ooligan (talk) 15:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-18 23:31 (UTC)
Scope:
De Hoge Terhand (OudeIeperstraat, Terhand), view from Peperstraat
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-19 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Allegory of military power by Gregorio Lazzarini, Museo Correr in Venice
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-19 06:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Comibaena bajularia – mounted specimen male ventral

 Support USeful and used --Llez (talk) 06:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-19 06:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Dona i flors - Miquel Blay - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-02-19 06:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Pupa solidula (Solid Pupa), shell
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 08:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-02-19 16:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Detail of the Terp fan de Takomst (Where tide determines.)

 Comment Like the image but am having trouble with the scope. The image is more specific than just a generic detail.
Terp fan de Takomst (Mound of the Future) refers to the entire work of art just outside the dike near the Netherlands village of Blije.
Waar Gettij Bepaalt (Where the Tide Determines) is a sign that identifies the pier-like structure at the top of the mound artwork that serves to measure the high tide level of the Wadden Sea.
This is probably more words than I prefer in a scope but suggest "Waar Gettij Bepaalt (Where the Tide Determines) sign on tide gauge structure at Terp fan de Takomst (Mound of the Future)". --GRDN711 (talk) 02:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2024-02-19 19:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Ficedula semitorquata (semicollared flycatcher) eggs
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nirmal Dulal (talk) on 2024-02-20 02:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Carpodacus rodopeplus (Spot-winged rosefinch) - Male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-20 05:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Il Doge Antonio Venier by Jacobello dalle Masegne - Museo archeologico nazionale Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-20 05:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Comibaena bajularia specimens - Female dorsal

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-20 06:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Light-bearing child - Qing Periode (1644-1911) - Musée Georges Labit Toulouse
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-02-20 06:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Minnivola pyxidata (Box Scallop), right valve
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ввласенко (talk) on 2024-02-20 08:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Verónica (Suerte de capote)
Used in:
Corida
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2024-02-20 08:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Ficedula hypoleuca eggs (European pied flycatcher (Hypoleuca)) eggs

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 04:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nirmal Dulal (talk) on 2024-02-20 15:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Enicurus schistaceus (Slaty-backed forktail)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rjcastillo (talk) on 2024-02-20 23:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de Gracia, Nercón Our Lady of Grace Church of Nercón.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nirmal Dulal (talk) on 2024-02-21 04:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Pomatorhinus ruficollis (Streak-breasted scimitar babbler)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-02-21 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Minnivola pyxidata (Box Scallop), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-21 06:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman statues in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Muse, like Cleopatra
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-21 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Comibaena bajularia specimens – Female ventral

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-21 06:04 (UTC)
Scope:
S. Agostino, S. Pietro, S. Giovanni Battista by Paolo Venezian - Correr museum
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2024-02-21 07:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Ficedula speculigera (Atlas pied flycatcher) eggs
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gnom (talk) on 2024-02-21 10:39 (UTC)
Scope:
autograph of Joseph Haydn's composition Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser, then as the Austrian imperial anthem, now the melody of the German national anthem
Used in:
e.g. en:Joseph Haydn, en:Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser
Reason:
This is a scan of the original autograph of the Austrian imperial anthem by composer Joseph Haydn, which has since become the melody of the German national anthem. The original document is held by the Austrian National Library, which created the scan. We also have a scan of one of Haydn's sketches: File:Haydn Kaiserlied Skizze.jpg -- Gnom (talk)
Fixed it, sorry about that. --Gnom (talk) 13:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gnom (talk) on 2024-02-21 10:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Helme Heine (German children's book author and illustrator)
Used in:
en:Helme Heine
Reason:
portrait photo of Helme Heine, multiple award-winning German children's book author and illustrator -- Gnom (talk)
Sure, done. --Gnom (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gnom (talk) on 2024-02-21 15:03 (UTC)
Scope:
heckelphone
Used in:
heckelphone
Reason:
A professional photo of a heckelphone, coming directly from the manufacturer, Wilhelm Heckel. -- Gnom (talk)
Fixed it, sorry about that.
Not fixed. It's the scope that must be connected to a relevant category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ugh, but now it should be correct.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-21 17:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Hoogmolen (Aalbeke), view from Luingnestraat
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-21 17:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Donjon du château des Princes de Ligne, view from Chemin de Halage (Be)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-02-21 18:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Reformierte Kirche Zernez South side.
Used in:
Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-21 22:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Eglise Saint-Aybert (Bléharies), view from Rue Wibault-Bouchart (Brunehaut)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-22 06:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Ara Grimani - Museo archeologico nazionale Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-22 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
The Choir Girls by José Gutiérrez Solana - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-22 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Angelo Maccagnino - Female portrait in Correr Museum
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-02-22 06:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Calliostoma hernandezi, shell
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2024-02-22 08:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Ficedula parva (museum specimens) (red-breasted flycatcher) eggs
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-22 09:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Sint-Amanduskerk (Bellegem), view from Bellegemplaats (Kortrijk)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-22 10:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Binche train station, view from Place Eugène Derbaix
Used in:
Global usage

 Support Best in scope. --Milseburg (talk) 14:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-21 12:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Aquila audax fleayi (Tasmanian wedge-tailed eagle) in flight; mobbed by forest ravens

only in flight images that are from Tasmania

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-22 11:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Petrochelidon nigricans nigricans (Tree martin) with nesting material
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-22 11:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Petrochelidon nigricans nigricans (Tree martin) in fight
Reason:
Other decent photo is WA ssp -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Milseburg (talk) on 2024-02-22 14:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Kreuzberg seen from Eierhauckberg
Used in:
de:Kreuzberg (Rhön)
Reason:
The mountain offering this view is located in a restricted military area. An opportunity for such a perspective arises rarely, only during brief openings of the ground every few years for two days. -- Milseburg (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-02-22 17:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Main entrance of the Baselgia rifurmada, Ardez
Used in:
Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Hemmers (talk) on 2024-02-22 15:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Steyr LP2 Air Pistol
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-02-22 18:55 (UTC)
Scope:
John P. Wronowski - IMO 9337432
Reason:
The tow boat, John P. Wronowski, is used in commercial and government tug and towing contracts around New London and Groton, Connecticut USA. This is the best view of this tow boat by name, uncluttered by submarines. -- GRDN711 (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rjcastillo (talk) on 2024-02-23 02:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Chonchi Church of Our Lady of the Rosary - Facade.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-02-23 06:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Calliostoma depictum, shell
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-23 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Teatro La Fenice (Venice) – Right Mascaron of the facade.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-23 06:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Ranunculus asiaticus - example of totipotency
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-23 06:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Christ at the column by Pietro Da Vicenza- Correr museum
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2024-02-23 07:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Muscicapa striata eggs (spotted flycatcher (striata)) eggs
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Portrait of Vicente Guerrero[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) on 2021-01-21 17:47 (UTC)
Scope:

Retrato Vicente Guerrero por Anacleto Escutia en Palacio Nacional (Mexico)

(Portrait of Vicente Guerrero by Anacleto Escutia in Palacio Nacional (Mexico))

Previous reviews

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 08:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ErickTErick (talk) on 2023-10-31 21:45 (UTC)
Scope:

Retrato póstumo del presidente Vicente Guerrero en el Museo Nacional de Historia, Ciudad de México

(Posthumous portrait of President Vicente Guerrero in the National Museum of History, Mexico City)
Reason:
The version of this image which currently considered the most valuable within its scope is of much lower quality than this newer version. In addition, the name given to the scope is factually wrong about the location of the painting (it is not within Palacio Nacional) and Mexico's Spanish name is misspelled (it's México, not Mexico). -- ErickTErick (talk)
✓ Done Started MVR ErickTErick (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 08:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:02 (UTC)
Scope:
El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach

 Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am doing it according this reccomendation Ezarateesteban 23:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 08:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:00 (UTC)
Scope:
El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach

 Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 08:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Anciens bains municipaux de Colmar[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-01-22 12:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 08:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2023-12-29 07:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)

 Comment The light on the cble is a bit distracting. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 08:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"