User talk:Arlo Barnes

complete book of knowledge edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

You have replaced a perfectly good file with a gigantic image that does not serve its purpose. I have attempted to revert your upload, and please consider the use of the image (on user pages), where it is not a thumbnail. Thanks. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 15:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alright, should the high-quality image be file:Book of Knowledge.jpg, then? Currently the two files are near-identical, but for some reason both are used by the service awards templates. Arlo James Barnes 15:45, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Because I think that one of the three is the original (Tutnum6.jpg) and the latter three are digitally retouched (although slightly). It seems that in Book of Knowledge.jpg it was added the string "secret appendix", in Book of Knowledge2.jpg also the string "errata" and finally in Book of Knowledge.jpg a blue "signed copy" stamp. For the uses of the file, at least on it.wiki, see (in ascending order):

it:Wikipedia:Barnstar al merito wikipediano#Illustre Looshpah (o Master Editor) (original file),
it:Wikipedia:Barnstar al merito wikipediano#Propizio Looshpah (o Master Editor II) (with "secret appendix"),
it:Wikipedia:Barnstar al merito wikipediano#Magnifico e Più che Perfetto Looshpah (o Master Editor III) (with "secret appendix" and errata corrige),
it:Wikipedia:Barnstar al merito wikipediano#Looshpah Laureato dell'Enciclopedia (o Master Editor IV) (with signed copy stamp).
it:Wikipedia:Barnstar al merito wikipediano#Lord Gran Togneme Vicario (o Grandmaster Editor) (original 2nd edition cover)
it:Wikipedia:Barnstar al merito wikipediano#Lord Gran Togneme Laureato (o Grandmaster Editor di I classe) (cover + barcode)

--ZandDev (talk) 02:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You should not upload over an image with an another one very different (the change of size is ok, but it were also changed the colour and the part of the book represented) and also with a completely different aspect ratio (You have cropped the image with an aspect ratio of 5 (225×1115), so a huge image appeared on the pages where the file was previously used). You should upload them with new names, as I saw that you have multiple new images about the book other than the three images already present in The Complete Compendium of Universal Knowledge). --ZandDev (talk) 17:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Encyclopædia files move edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I also moved the files that you have inserted in The Complete Compendium of Universal Knowledge (as they refers to a different book) to The Book of Knowledge, but I was unable to clearly distinguish The Book of Knowledge (Q64775219) (en) from The Children's Encyclopædia (Q7722457) (en) and if a new category for containing the files I moved is necessary or more suitable. --ZandDev (talk) 02:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cropped image does not correspond to the original image edit

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello! It seems the cropped image does not correspond to the original image in 1 according to the file history. Can you take a look at it? It seems the original file for the cropped image is 2 and that the cropped image may have been uploaded to an existing filename thus overwriting that file (which should not be possible). --Bensin (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Overwriting is limited for pages with the {{Artwork}} template, but is technically possible otherwise. I decided David needed a headshot for his Wikidata page, and thought the 2023 image was a better fit than the 2017 image. Arlo James Barnes 20:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Biofouling" edit

Latest comment: 26 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Biofouling appears to be marine related only. Should this be here? [1]. Also, thanks for the 'thank you.' -- Ooligan (talk) 04:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was also hesitant, but I don't really know of a better cat that expresses "organism in machine caused machine to cease normal function for a time". Arlo James Barnes 23:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Reimu Hakurei Minna no Kisekae 2 laughing.png edit

Latest comment: 19 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Reimu Hakurei Minna no Kisekae 2 laughing.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dronebogus (talk) 02:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 8 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:IfThenSheCan by Elvert Barnes 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Add topic